Eimeria and Sarcocystis in Raccoons in Illinois1

Eimeria nuttalli oocysts were found in 58% (21/36) and E. procyonis oocysts in 25% (9/36) of raccoons Procyon lotor in Illinois, and sporocysts of Sarcocystis sp. in 17% (2/12) of other raccoons in Illinois. The oocysts of E. nuttalli were ellipsoidal to ovoid. 15–21 × 12–17 μm, with a one-layered, smooth, colorless wall. The oocysts of E. procyonis were 22–28 × 18–22 μm, with a rough, striated, brownish, two-layered wall. The sporulated sporocysts of Sarcocystis sp. were 11–13 × 8–10 μm. Attempts to infect baby pigs by feeding them sporocysts of Sarcocystis sp. from the raccoon failed.     

Occurrence of Fibronectin on the Primary Mesenchyme Cell Surface During Migration in the Sea Urchin Embryo

The distribution of fibronectin in situ in the sea urchin embryo was examined by using indirect immunofluorescence with an antibody raised against human plasma fibronectin. Fibronectin was detected on the surfaces of primary mesenchyme cells in the mid-mesenchyme blastula stage, when these cells are migratory. However, it was not detected on these cells at the early mesenchyme blastula or early gastrula stages. Also, it was not detected in the blastocoel nor on the basal surface of the blastular wall. The migration of the primary mesenchyme cells is therefore correlated with a stage-dependent occurrence of cell surface-associated fibronectin.     

Estimation and Correction of Visibility Bias in Aerial Surveys of Wintering Ducks

Abstract: Incomplete detection of all individuals leading to negative bias in abundance estimates is a pervasive source of error in aerial surveys of wildlife, and correcting that bias is a critical step in improving surveys. We conducted experiments using duck decoys as surrogates for live ducks to estimate bias associated with surveys of wintering ducks in Mississippi, USA. We found detection of decoy groups was related to wetland cover type (open vs. forested), group size (1–100 decoys), and interaction of these variables. Observers who detected decoy groups reported counts that averaged 78% of the decoys actually present, and this counting bias was not influenced by either covariate cited above. We integrated this sightability model into estimation procedures for our sample surveys with weight adjustments derived from probabilities of group detection (estimated by logistic regression) and count bias. To estimate variances of abundance estimates, we used bootstrap resampling of transects included in aerial surveys and data from the bias-correction experiment. When we implemented bias correction procedures on data from a field survey conducted in January 2004, we found bias-corrected estimates of abundance increased 36–42%, and associated standard errors increased 38–55%, depending on species or group estimated. We deemed our method successful for integrating correction of visibility bias in an existing sample survey design for wintering ducks in Mississippi, and we believe this procedure could be implemented in a variety of sampling problems for other locations and species. (JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 72(3):808–813; 2008)     

The Effect of Hadacidin on Bud Development and its Implications for Apical Dominance

Hadacidin, which is known to inhibit the enzyme adenylo-succinate synthetase, was applied locally to lateral buds on decapitated Pisum sativum L. plants. In controls the buds grew out normally, but the treated buds were almost completely inhibited. After a delay, the buds overcame the inhibition, and their subsequent outgrowth could be further hastened by the local application of a cytokinin. The inhibition, unlike that due to IAA, was not transported to a second bud, and it could be largely reversed by kinetin or dimethylallylaminopurine. Adenine itself produces little or no reversal, however. There was some reversal by aspartic acid, which is known to reverse, at least partially, the hadacidin inhibition of the isolated enzyme. It is deduced that lateral bud development is dependent on the synthesis of a cytokinin, which may take place by a biochemical route similar, but probably not identical, to that for adenine. It follows that this synthesis takes place locally in the bud itself.